From: | Michael Loftis <mloftis(at)wgops(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pierre-Andre Michel <pamichel(at)smartgene(dot)ch> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Why does postgres not take into account my index on a bigint column ? |
Date: | 2002-04-15 15:16:38 |
Message-ID: | 3CBAEED6.9030202@wgops.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
IMHO this is a bug in PostgreSQL.... Ints of any type are not supposed
to be quoted, and whether-or-not they are shouldn't affect the planning
and execution of the query...
Anyone from -hackers read this? Or should I repost it there?
Pierre-Andre Michel wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I noticed that postgres does not take into account index on BIGINT
> column when the value specified in the WHERE condition is not quoted.
>
> My problem is that I use third part programs that automatically
> generate many select queries where numeric values are not surrounded
> with quotes.
>
>
>
> So does anybody know a way to force postgres to consider using indices
> on bigint columns even when the value in a where cond is not
> surrounded by quotes ?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> ----
>
> For instance, in the following 'header' table I have a bigint column
> 'objectId'. Here is what I get when running the explain command:
>
>
>
> idns_dev=# explain select * from header where objectid = '47866';
>
>
>
> NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
> Index Scan using header_pkey on header (cost=0.00..3.92 rows=1 width=552)
> EXPLAIN
>
>
>
> idns_dev=# explain select * from header where objectid = 47866;
>
>
>
> NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
> Seq Scan on header (cost=0.00..2246.50 rows=1 width=552)
> EXPLAIN
>
> ------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________
> Pierre-André Michel
>
>
>
> SmartGene SA
> PSE Bâtiment C
> EPFL, Ecublens
> CH-1015 Lausanne
>
>
>
> tél. prof.: (+4121) 693 85 84
> mobile: (+4178) 681 53 03
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Moritz Sinn | 2002-04-15 15:51:53 | function for creating random id |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-15 15:10:10 | Re: size of NULL field? |