Re: ANALYZE after restore

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ANALYZE after restore
Date: 2002-04-03 19:41:18
Message-ID: 3CAB5ADE.B31DCBB0@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > I agree adding an automatic background vacuum thread/process/something
> > will be really, really useful too.
> > Should we instead have this proposed automatic background something also
> > update the statistics every now and again?
>
> Yes, I had always assumed that would be part of the feature ...

Hi Tom,

Cool. I wasn't sure of that (probably haven't been following the
correct threads).

That makes way more sense then.

:-)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

>
> regards, tom lane

--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-04-03 20:03:23 Re: timeout implementation issues
Previous Message Mikhail Terekhov 2002-04-03 19:40:15 Re: notification: pg_notify ?