Re: ANALYZE after restore

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ANALYZE after restore
Date: 2002-04-03 19:30:10
Message-ID: 11785.1017862210@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> I agree adding an automatic background vacuum thread/process/something
> will be really, really useful too.
> Should we instead have this proposed automatic background something also
> update the statistics every now and again?

Yes, I had always assumed that would be part of the feature ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikhail Terekhov 2002-04-03 19:40:15 Re: notification: pg_notify ?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-03 19:25:07 Re: Locale support is now on by default