Re: What is the difference between --enable-multibyte and

From: Weiping He <laser(at)zhengmai(dot)com(dot)cn>
To: Jeff Lu <jklcom(at)mindspring(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What is the difference between --enable-multibyte and
Date: 2002-03-24 15:11:28
Message-ID: 3C9DECA0.DF7ED594@zhengmai.com.cn
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jeff Lu wrote:

> Hi,
>
> My database is configured with --enable-multibyte. I thought this is
> what I needed to be able to store Chinese Characters. Is this a correct
> assumption? Anyhow, when I tried to write to the database with Chinese
> content, the content becomes jibberish. Do I need to enable unicode
> conversion? If that's the case, can I just run configure with
> --enable-unicode-conversion on my current database without any side
> effect on my data?
>
> Thanks
> -Jeff
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

when > 7.2 the --enalbe-unicode-conversion is auto enabled
when specifing --enable-multibyte.
for pre 7.2, only when you want to store data in database using unicode,
do you need to --enable-unicode-conversion, if not, for example, you are
using EUC_TW or other encoding (but not unicode), I think you don't need
to enable it. but to my expreience, enable unicode is better (which is the
default case when > 7.2). because you can use unicode autoconversion
facility to extend your client encoding (such as GBK etc.)
I think the only side effect to your application is speed.

regards laser

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Emberson 2002-03-24 17:43:44 Large Object Location in 7.3
Previous Message Mark kirkwood 2002-03-24 12:23:07 Re: SQL Server performing much better?!?!