Re: elog() patch

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: elog() patch
Date: 2002-03-01 19:53:53
Message-ID: 3C7FDC51.8BCE9E36@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

...
> My take was to have WARNING and NOTICE, yours is WARNING and INFO ?
> For me INFO is also better to understand than NOTICE.
> Not sure that alone is worth the change though, since lots of
> clients will currently parse "NOTICE".

fwiw, I find the connotations of these terms to be, in increasing order
of severity:

INFO, NOTICE, WARNING

though the distinction between INFO and NOTICE is not so great that one
absolutely could not replace the other.

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dann Corbit 2002-03-01 20:08:57 Re: eWeek Poll: Which database is most critical to your
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2002-03-01 19:13:39 Re: Oracle vs PostgreSQL in real life