Re: elog() patch

Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> ...
> > My take was to have WARNING and NOTICE, yours is WARNING and INFO ?
> > For me INFO is also better to understand than NOTICE.
> > Not sure that alone is worth the change though, since lots of
> > clients will currently parse "NOTICE".
>
> fwiw, I find the connotations of these terms to be, in increasing order
> of severity:
>
> INFO, NOTICE, WARNING
>
> though the distinction between INFO and NOTICE is not so great that one
> absolutely could not replace the other.

Yes, that was my thought to. I am not sure we have any need for NOTICE
when we have INFO and WARNING. The NOTICE sort of kept both meanings,
and we don't need that anymore.

On a humorous note, when we got the code from Berkeley, WARN was the
original tag to error out a query.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026