Re: Solaris Performance

From: "P(dot)J(dot) \"Josh\" Rovero" <rovero(at)sonalysts(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Solaris Performance
Date: 2002-02-04 21:07:31
Message-ID: 3C5EF813.7040503@sonalysts.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

For non-postgresql applications, the Suns are
typically faster than the HPs. While direct
comparisons are always dangerous, the SPARC
chips are clocked at about 2-3 times what
the PA-RISC chips are.

The postgresql performance on Solaris is
an order of magnitude (10x) slower than
Linux x86 at same CPU clock speed.

Tom Lane wrote:

> "P.J. \"Josh\" Rovero" <rovero(at)sonalysts(dot)com> writes:
>
>>We've been running equivalent configurations and schema on
>>HP-UX, Solaris, and x86 Linux, and benchmarking with
>>pgbench and some application-specific data. All testing
>>was with 7.2rc2, and all were built natively on each platform.
>>
>
>>Performance on Solaris (2.6 and 2.7) seems lackluster,
>>
>
> Seeing as how those are three different hardware platforms, one must
> wonder how sure you are that you are comparing apples to apples.
> A difference in CPU speed or disk speed could explain everything.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>

--
P. J. "Josh" Rovero Sonalysts, Inc.
Email: rovero(at)sonalysts(dot)com www.sonalysts.com 215 Parkway North
Work: (860)326-3671 or 442-4355 Waterford CT 06385
***********************************************************************

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-02-04 21:12:13 Re: Solaris Performance
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-02-04 20:51:06 Re: Solaris Performance