| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "P(dot)J(dot) \"Josh\" Rovero" <rovero(at)sonalysts(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Solaris Performance |
| Date: | 2002-02-04 20:51:06 |
| Message-ID: | 200202042051.g14Kp6V12579@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "P.J. \"Josh\" Rovero" <rovero(at)sonalysts(dot)com> writes:
> > We've been running equivalent configurations and schema on
> > HP-UX, Solaris, and x86 Linux, and benchmarking with
> > pgbench and some application-specific data. All testing
> > was with 7.2rc2, and all were built natively on each platform.
>
> > Performance on Solaris (2.6 and 2.7) seems lackluster,
>
> Seeing as how those are three different hardware platforms, one must
> wonder how sure you are that you are comparing apples to apples.
> A difference in CPU speed or disk speed could explain everything.
Agreed, but if I had to take a guess, my bet is he is going to say the
Solaris box is faster in all ways. We have heard such reports before.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | P.J. "Josh" Rovero | 2002-02-04 21:07:31 | Re: Solaris Performance |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-04 20:45:10 | Re: Long column names and table names |