| From: | Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: What needs to be done? |
| Date: | 2001-08-03 17:15:25 |
| Message-ID: | 3B6ADC2D.3070204@xythos.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
GUC is how this type of stuff is controlled on the server, but I don't
know of any examples where it controlls client only functionality. Why
would you want parameters on the server that the server doesn't use?
thanks,
--Barry
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>If people feel that backwards compatibiliy is important I would suggest
>>it be done in the following way:
>>
>>A new connection parameter named 'compatible' be defined whose default
>>value is 7.2 (i.e new functionality). But you could set compatible=7.1
>>to revert back to the old functionality. (This is how Oracle deals with
>>similar issues in its code base). This parameter could then be set
>>either in the JDBC URL (i.e.
>>jdbc:postgresql://localhost:5432:template1?compatible=7.1) or passed
>>explicily in the connect() method.
>>
>
> GUC seems to be the way to control these things. It can be set in
> postgresql.conf and via a SET command.
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-03 17:50:09 | Re: Re: What needs to be done? |
| Previous Message | Horst Herb | 2001-08-03 16:37:32 | redo log |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-03 17:50:09 | Re: Re: What needs to be done? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-03 16:21:55 | Re: Current cvs does not compile jdbc1 driver |