Re: Re: What needs to be done?

From: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: What needs to be done?
Date: 2001-08-03 17:15:25
Message-ID: 3B6ADC2D.3070204@xythos.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

GUC is how this type of stuff is controlled on the server, but I don't
know of any examples where it controlls client only functionality. Why
would you want parameters on the server that the server doesn't use?

thanks,
--Barry

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>>If people feel that backwards compatibiliy is important I would suggest
>>it be done in the following way:
>>
>>A new connection parameter named 'compatible' be defined whose default
>>value is 7.2 (i.e new functionality). But you could set compatible=7.1
>>to revert back to the old functionality. (This is how Oracle deals with
>>similar issues in its code base). This parameter could then be set
>>either in the JDBC URL (i.e.
>>jdbc:postgresql://localhost:5432:template1?compatible=7.1) or passed
>>explicily in the connect() method.
>>
>
> GUC seems to be the way to control these things. It can be set in
> postgresql.conf and via a SET command.
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-03 17:50:09 Re: Re: What needs to be done?
Previous Message Horst Herb 2001-08-03 16:37:32 redo log

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-03 17:50:09 Re: Re: What needs to be done?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-03 16:21:55 Re: Current cvs does not compile jdbc1 driver