| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Call for platforms |
| Date: | 2001-04-06 05:29:28 |
| Message-ID: | 3ACD5438.793E838@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Bottom line: 7.1RC1 passes most of the regression tests on
> NetBSD/macppc. It's probably good enough for normal use since the
> differences are not extensive, but someone would need to look at the
> diff's for longer than the 10 seconds or so I've spent so far, and
> someone should actually set it up for real use to check that.
I'll mark it as supported; the horology diffs are not significant and
geometry is known to be a bit different on some platforms.
Including the not-tested-for-7.1 NetBSD/m68k, we are supported on 30
platforms for the upcoming release, with definite potential for a couple
of more (QNX and Ultrix).
*That* is some sort of milestone! :))
- Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-04-06 05:50:59 | Re: Re: Call for platforms |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-04-06 05:14:53 | Re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] |