Re: Re: Call for platforms

If somethings happen this weekend, I *MAY* have a HP9000/433s (M68K)
running NetBSD to play with....

Not enough to hold up the release, but...

LER

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 4/6/01, 12:29:28 AM, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> wrote
regarding [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms:

> > Bottom line: 7.1RC1 passes most of the regression tests on
> > NetBSD/macppc. It's probably good enough for normal use since the
> > differences are not extensive, but someone would need to look at the
> > diff's for longer than the 10 seconds or so I've spent so far, and
> > someone should actually set it up for real use to check that.

> I'll mark it as supported; the horology diffs are not significant and
> geometry is known to be a bit different on some platforms.

> Including the not-tested-for-7.1 NetBSD/m68k, we are supported on 30
> platforms for the upcoming release, with definite potential for a couple
> of more (QNX and Ultrix).

> *That* is some sort of milestone! :))

> - Thomas

> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html