From: | "Daniel J(dot) Kressin" <dkressin(at)globalcrossing(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: sorting on inet type? |
Date: | 2001-03-20 17:51:41 |
Message-ID: | 3AB798AD.89419F@globalcrossing.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
> I believe this is fixed in 7.1.
>
> LER
Is there a workaround for 7.0.x? Short of adding extra columns to store
the separate octets and sorting on them?
--
Dan
____ Kressin ____ .-----------------------------------.
/___ \____________/ __ \ | Unix SysAdmin |
\ \ / / \ | | Global Crossing |
___/ __\/\/rench_ \__/ | | dkressin(at)globalcrossing(dot)com |
\____/ \____/ | http://www.vib.org/wrench/ |
`-----------------------------------'
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-20 17:56:28 | Re: sorting on inet type? |
Previous Message | Benjamin Franks | 2001-03-20 17:38:22 | RE: "critical mass" reached |