From: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel "J(dot) Kressin" <dkressin(at)globalcrossing(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: sorting on inet type? |
Date: | 2001-03-20 17:38:21 |
Message-ID: | 20010320.17382100@ler-freebie.iadfw.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I believe this is fixed in 7.1.
LER
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 3/20/01, 11:16:42 AM, Daniel "J." Kressin <dkressin(at)globalcrossing(dot)com>
wrote regarding [GENERAL] sorting on inet type?:
> I have a table with an inet column, which I entered in order initially,
> so they came out like:
> 1.2.3.4
> 1.2.3.5
> 1.2.3.40
> 1.2.3.41
> After updating, say, 1.2.3.5, it moves to the end. I understand why,
> that's not the problem. Adding an 'ORDER BY host(ip)' clause causes the
> ordering to be:
> 1.2.3.4
> 1.2.3.40
> 1.2.3.41
> 1.2.3.5
> Is there an easy way to return to the original order, or do I need to
> write a custom PL/SQL function to parse the octets and do sorting
> manually? If the latter is the case, help/hints would be appreciated.
> Thanks.
> P.S. Thanks to the group for all the help you've given on my previous
> questions!
> --
> Dan
> ____ Kressin ____ .-----------------------------------.
> /___ \____________/ __ \ | Unix SysAdmin |
> \ \ / / \ | | Global Crossing |
> ___/ __\/\/rench_ \__/ | | dkressin(at)globalcrossing(dot)com |
> \____/ \____/ | http://www.vib.org/wrench/ |
> `-----------------------------------'
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Benjamin Franks | 2001-03-20 17:38:22 | RE: "critical mass" reached |
Previous Message | Daniel J. Kressin | 2001-03-20 17:16:42 | sorting on inet type? |