Re: Performance monitor

From: Justin Clift <aa2(at)bigpond(dot)net(dot)au>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance monitor
Date: 2001-03-08 03:14:40
Message-ID: 3AA6F920.8A6E64FA@bigpond.net.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mike Mascari's idea (er... his assembling of the other ideas) still
sounds like the Best Solution though.

:-)

+ Justin

+++

I like the idea of updating shared memory with the performance
statistics,
current query execution information, etc., providing a function to fetch
those statistics, and perhaps providing a system view (i.e.
pg_performance)
based upon such functions which can be queried by the administrator.

FWIW,

Mike Mascari
mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com

+++

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > I think Bruce wants per-backend data, and this approach would seem to only
> > get the data for the current backend.
> >
> > Also, I really don't like the proposal to write files to /tmp. If we want a
> > perf tool, then we need to have something like 'top', which will
> > continuously update. With 40 backends, the idea of writing 40 file to /tmp
> > every second seems a little excessive to me.
>
> My idea was to use 'ps' to gather most of the information, and just use
> the internal stats when someone clicked on a backend and wanted more
> information.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-08 03:17:51 Re: Performance monitor
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-08 03:12:16 Re: Performance monitor