Re: Performance monitor

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance monitor
Date: 2001-03-08 03:12:16
Message-ID: 200103080312.WAA20336@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> At 18:05 7/03/01 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> All in all, I do not see this as an easy task that you can whip out and
> >> then release as a 7.1 patch without extensive testing. And given that,
> >> I'd rather see it done with what I consider the right long-term approach,
> >> rather than a dead-end hack. I think doing it in a signal handler is
> >> ultimately going to be a dead-end hack.
> >
> >Well, the signal stuff will get me going at least.
>
> Didn't someone say this can't be done safely - or am I missing something?

OK, I will write just the all-process display part, that doesn't need
any per-backend info because it gets it all from 'ps'. Then maybe
someone will come up with a nifty idea, or I will play with my local
copy to see how it can be done.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2001-03-08 03:14:40 Re: Performance monitor
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-08 03:06:38 Re: Performance monitor