From: | Ned Lilly <ned(at)greatbridge(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Morten W(dot) Petersen" <morten(at)esol(dot)no> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Chris Ryan <chris(at)greatbridge(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Can PostgreSQL be a mail backend? |
Date: | 2001-02-27 13:56:14 |
Message-ID: | 3A9BB1FE.3010003@greatbridge.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
We're looking at porting GNU Mailman to use Postgres as a backend,
breaking off the mail handling functionality into free-standing Python
scripts, and allowing for a separate presentation layer as well... looks
promising so far. We'll be doing the development on our greatbridge.org
website - I know Chris (cc'ed) would love to have some help. Some
people in the Mailman community have expressed interest as well...
Morten W. Petersen wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> I'm wondering if postgres could be capable of acting as a
> mail storage. This would imply storing messages, from
> 1KB to > 100MB in size. The expected volume is 4000
> messages a day, and the database may store up to,
> lets say, 500000 messages.
>
> Could postgres cope with this? (How is the support for
> big data fields now BTW?)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Morten
>
>
>
--
----------------------------------------------------
Ned Lilly e: ned(at)greatbridge(dot)com
Vice President w: www.greatbridge.com
Evangelism / Hacker Relations v: 757.233.5523
Great Bridge, LLC f: 757.233.5555
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Frank Joerdens | 2001-02-27 13:56:59 | Re: Can PostgreSQL be a mail backend? |
Previous Message | John Madden | 2001-02-27 13:54:57 | Re: Can PostgreSQL be a mail backend? |