| From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
| Cc: | Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Include files for SPI are not installed |
| Date: | 2001-02-06 19:12:06 |
| Message-ID: | 3A804C86.C4B550BC@wgcr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Karel Zak wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > Certain include files are installed by src/include/Makefile and by
> > interfaces/libpq++/Makefile. However, they in turn include others that
> > are not installed, thus obviating the usefulness of the ones that are.
> In your module you can use arbitrary routines from PG not only SPI,
> for example you trigger needs work with some datetypes and for this
> needs include anything from include/utils/ ... It expect install *all*
> header files. Not is better download PG sources and use -I option for
> your gcc?
No. Full tree takes at minimum 36MB -- even pulling the _entire_
src/include tree over is only 2MB.
> I expect header files on /usr/include/pgsql for client programming not
> for SPI.
Why? I know of several people doing SPI work with no source tree
installed.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mathieu Dube | 2001-02-06 19:15:22 | Re: using the same connection? |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-02-06 19:09:06 | Re: Include files for SPI are not installed |