From: | Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Postgresql <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Strange error message |
Date: | 2000-10-02 05:42:33 |
Message-ID: | 39D82049.C6A3CBE7@albourne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com> writes:
> > we've suddenly started getting this error message out of postgres
> > (7.0.2). Does anybody know where it comes from?
>
> > ERROR: UNLockBuffer: buffer 0 is not locked
>
> Evidently something is passing an invalid buffer number to LockBuffer
> in src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c. (0 is InvalidBuffer, but
> LockBuffer won't notice that unless you compiled with asserts enabled.)
> Whatever the bug is, it's not directly LockBuffer's fault.
Right, I'vebuilt a new database and everything seemed fine for a while and
now I've got this message back. It is due to the index on one of our
tables getting messed up - at least, if we drop and recreate the index
everything is fine. What should I do to track down what is happening?
Compile with asserts, or run with specific logging? Any advice
appreciated!
Adriaan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-02 06:16:47 | pg_regress gripes |
Previous Message | Adriaan Joubert | 2000-10-02 05:21:45 | Re: Alpha spinlock |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-02 06:22:49 | Re: Strange error message |
Previous Message | Emils Klotins | 2000-10-02 05:38:08 | Q: spinlock on Alpha? (PG7.0.2) |