| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com |
| Cc: | Postgresql <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Strange error message |
| Date: | 2000-09-29 15:45:47 |
| Message-ID: | 17537.970242347@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com> writes:
> we've suddenly started getting this error message out of postgres
> (7.0.2). Does anybody know where it comes from?
> ERROR: UNLockBuffer: buffer 0 is not locked
Evidently something is passing an invalid buffer number to LockBuffer
in src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c. (0 is InvalidBuffer, but
LockBuffer won't notice that unless you compiled with asserts enabled.)
Whatever the bug is, it's not directly LockBuffer's fault.
What exactly are you doing that provokes this message?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-09-29 16:24:16 | Re: Installation layout is still hazardous for shared prefixes |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-09-29 14:47:33 | Re: Installation layout is still hazardous for shared prefixes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-09-30 02:42:12 | Re: [PORTS] Locale bug |
| Previous Message | Adriaan Joubert | 2000-09-29 14:46:44 | Strange error message |