Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

From: Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Ned Lilly <ned(at)greatbridge(dot)com>
Cc: "'PostgreSQL General'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others
Date: 2000-08-16 02:06:17
Message-ID: 3999F719.D74008DE@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ned Lilly wrote:
>
> Er... let me put it this way. Proprietary 2 prefers to run on Windows NT.

The performance is so bad it must be MS-Access :-).

> Chris Bitmead wrote:
>
> > That's very helpful. Can you also tell us if Proprietry 1 or Proprietry
> > 2 was definitely NOT MS-SQL Server?

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alfred Perlstein 2000-08-16 02:07:29 Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others
Previous Message Ned Lilly 2000-08-16 01:49:05 Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others