Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others

From: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
To: Ned Lilly <ned(at)greatbridge(dot)com>
Cc: Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>, "'PostgreSQL General'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others
Date: 2000-08-16 02:07:29
Message-ID: 20000815190729.L4854@fw.wintelcom.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Chris Bitmead wrote:
>
> > That's very helpful. Can you also tell us if Proprietry 1 or Proprietry
> > 2 was definitely NOT MS-SQL Server?

* Ned Lilly <ned(at)greatbridge(dot)com> [000815 18:59] wrote:
> Er... let me put it this way. Proprietary 2 prefers to run on Windows NT.

It's oracle??? j/k

You have some people in San Jose at the Expo right? I was going to head
over to it tomorrow if you do.

-Alfred

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message g 2000-08-16 02:08:57 Re: pg_dumpall problems
Previous Message Chris Bitmead 2000-08-16 02:06:17 Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others