From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
Date: | 2024-12-30 20:02:47 |
Message-ID: | 39770e3aebfdf543fa2215fb300621a54b1b2634.camel@j-davis.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2024-12-26 at 13:54 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am _again_ not happy with this part of the patch. Please reply to
> the
> criticism in my November 19th email:
>
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Zz0T1BENIFDnXmwf@momjian.us
>
> rather than ignoring it and posting the same version of the patch.
I suggest that we make a new thread about the vacuumdb changes and
focus this thread and patch series on the pg_dump changes (and minor
flag adjustments to pg_upgrade).
Unless you think that the pg_dump changes should block on the vacuumdb
changes? In which case please let me know because the pg_dump changes
are otherwise close to commit.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2024-12-30 20:14:07 | Re: Query regarding pg_prewarm extension |
Previous Message | Sami Imseih | 2024-12-30 19:56:01 | Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX (with patch) |