From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Federico <cfederico87(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error |
Date: | 2021-05-04 23:18:48 |
Message-ID: | 3976561.1620170328@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-docs |
[ redirecting to pgsql-docs list ]
I wrote:
> Federico <cfederico87(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I did not come across that documented behavior while searching for regclass
>> in the pg docs. The most relevant page I was able to find was the Object
>> Identifier Types page that does not mention it.
>> I'll look into proposing a change in that docs page to mention it, if
>> that's the appropriate location for it.
> Hmm ... I *thought* it was documented, but perhaps not. If not,
> it's likely that the other reg* types are likewise underdocumented.
So what I was remembering was some text in the section about sequence
functions. That probably seemed appropriate when they were the only
real use of regclass; but these days we have regclass-accepting functions
all over, not to mention other OID alias types. I propose the attached
patch to move this info into the "Object Identifier Types" section.
regards, tom lane
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
improve-docs-about-OID-alias-types-1.patch | text/x-diff | 10.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2021-05-05 07:32:14 | Re: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-05-04 16:53:27 | Re: NULL handling in 1D array comparison |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2021-05-05 07:32:14 | Re: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error |
Previous Message | Daniel Westermann (DWE) | 2021-05-04 18:50:37 | Link t the souce code |