| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Federico <cfederico87(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error |
| Date: | 2021-05-04 14:34:52 |
| Message-ID: | 3904665.1620138892@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-docs |
Federico <cfederico87(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I did not come across that documented behavior while searching for regclass
> in the pg docs. The most relevant page I was able to find was the Object
> Identifier Types page that does not mention it.
> I’ll look into proposing a change in that docs page to mention it, if
> that’s the appropriate location for it.
Hmm ... I *thought* it was documented, but perhaps not. If not,
it's likely that the other reg* types are likewise underdocumented.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Federico Caselli | 2021-05-04 14:43:00 | RE: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error |
| Previous Message | Federico | 2021-05-04 14:29:32 | RE: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Federico Caselli | 2021-05-04 14:43:00 | RE: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error |
| Previous Message | Federico | 2021-05-04 14:29:32 | RE: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error |