| From: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
| Date: | 2000-07-10 00:28:04 |
| Message-ID: | 39691894.1A37592D@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Louis Bertrand wrote:
>
> There's a benchmark/review comparing PostgreSQL and MySQL on PHP Builder:
> http://www.phpbuilder.com/columns/tim20000705.php3
I'm wondering about the comments that postgres is slower in connection
time, could this be related to that libpq always uses asynchronous
sockets to connect? It always turns off blocking and then goes through a
state machine to go through the various stages of connect, instead of
just calling connect() and waiting for the kernel to do its thing. Of
course asynchronous connecting is a benefit when you want it. Or is the
overhead elsewhere, and I'm just being paranoid?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-07-10 00:37:46 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
| Previous Message | Charles Tassell | 2000-07-09 22:30:56 | Re: Recreating unique indices without having dups & downtime. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-07-10 00:37:46 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2000-07-10 00:24:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] MAX() of 0 records. |