| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
| Date: | 2000-07-10 00:37:46 |
| Message-ID: | 200007100037.UAA04258@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> Louis Bertrand wrote:
> >
> > There's a benchmark/review comparing PostgreSQL and MySQL on PHP Builder:
> > http://www.phpbuilder.com/columns/tim20000705.php3
>
> I'm wondering about the comments that postgres is slower in connection
> time, could this be related to that libpq always uses asynchronous
> sockets to connect? It always turns off blocking and then goes through a
> state machine to go through the various stages of connect, instead of
> just calling connect() and waiting for the kernel to do its thing. Of
> course asynchronous connecting is a benefit when you want it. Or is the
> overhead elsewhere, and I'm just being paranoid?
The truth is, we really don't know what it is.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Philip Warner | 2000-07-10 02:24:59 | Announce: Testers needed for pg_dump with BLOB support. |
| Previous Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-07-10 00:28:04 | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Philip Warner | 2000-07-10 00:38:30 | Re: Re: C language function dump problem |
| Previous Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-07-10 00:28:04 | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |