From: | Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, pgsql-oo(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Alternative new libpq interface. |
Date: | 2000-07-06 09:19:51 |
Message-ID: | 39644F37.EF8B8704@bitmead.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
--
> My gut feeling about this is that if a complete rewrite is being
> considered, it ought to be done as a new interface library that's
> independent of libpq.
I was thinking more along the lines of massaging the current libpq to
support the new interface/features rather than starting with a blank
slate. As you say libpq is well debugged and there are a lot of fine
details in there I don't want to mess with.
My aims are to get the OO features and streaming behaviour working with
a hopefully stable interface.
Does that affect your gut feeling? Your error observations are
significant and I think they dismiss my 1st suggestion. That leaves the
possibilities of the whole new interface versus massaging the current
interface with streaming/grouping APIs.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Philip Warner | 2000-07-06 11:05:09 | Re: 2nd update on TOAST |
Previous Message | Samy Elashmawy | 2000-07-06 09:12:23 | Re: PostgreSQL & the BSD License |