From: | Samy Elashmawy <samelash(at)ix(dot)netcom(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL & the BSD License |
Date: | 2000-07-06 09:12:23 |
Message-ID: | 3.0.3.32.20000706091223.00fa1a18@popd.ix.netcom.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
>Recently, Landmark/Great Bridge sent us a proposed revision to our
>existing license that, from what I can tell, has two paragraphs that
>pretty instantly none of the non-US developers felt comfortable with ...
>and that I, personally, could never agree to.
Sorry to jump in , but which two paragraphs were these and why were they
objectionable ?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Mascari | 2000-07-06 09:17:09 | Re: Find all the dates in the calendar week? |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2000-07-06 08:47:24 | Re: lztext and compression ratios... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-07-06 09:19:51 | Re: Alternative new libpq interface. |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2000-07-06 09:09:09 | Re: 2nd update on TOAST |