Re: Problem with a rule on upgrade to v7.1.1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jon Lapham <lapham(at)extracta(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Problem with a rule on upgrade to v7.1.1
Date: 2001-05-10 22:44:39
Message-ID: 3934.989534679@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jon Lapham <lapham(at)extracta(dot)com(dot)br> writes:
>> Uh, have you VACUUM ANALYZEd yet? Those EXPLAIN numbers look
>> suspiciously like default statistics ...

> Nope, forgot to on the little demonstration tables I made. I tacked the
> post-VACUUM ANALYZE explain results (they look much better) at the end of
> this email.

Ah. The plans for the little demo tables are uninteresting anyway,
but the plans for the real tables are interesting.

Next question: do you still have your 7.0.* DB up? Can you get an
EXPLAIN that shows how it did it (on the real tables)?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-05-10 22:50:24 Re: Regression tests for OBSD scrammed..
Previous Message john 2001-05-10 22:41:57 Re: 7.2 items