Re: Fwd: lwlocknames.h beautification attempt

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Postgres Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: lwlocknames.h beautification attempt
Date: 2025-03-17 06:58:32
Message-ID: 3932700.1742194712@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 7:53 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'm confused. Tom and I both said we didn't like this change,

> To me, Tom's feedback felt as being between ambivalent to the change and perhaps
> agree with the change, as long as pgindent did not throw a fit, which
> it did not.

Geez, are we really going to argue about whitespace in a generated
file? But anyway, what I said was that I didn't like the style with
the define'd symbol right-justified, because it didn't look like
anything else in our code. I'm entirely okay with the committed
version, which has plenty of precedent formatting-wise.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-03-17 07:03:13 Re: 64 bit numbers vs format strings
Previous Message vignesh C 2025-03-17 06:55:16 Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands