Re: pgbench help

From: Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Georges Racinet <gracinet(at)anybox(dot)fr>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgbench help
Date: 2012-12-24 14:27:27
Message-ID: 38E4DB9D-1003-4D0A-8CAD-E7E6041F65EE@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Sent from my iPad

On 24-Dec-2012, at 17:15, Georges Racinet <gracinet(at)anybox(dot)fr> wrote:

> On 12/24/2012 12:32 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 12/24/2012 2:43 AM, Georges Racinet wrote:
>>> Make sure both servers aren't running at the same time
>>
>> why? its perfectly OK to ahve severla postgres servers running at
>> once, as long as they are on different port numbers. I generally use
>> 5432, 5433, 5434, etc for this. mostly for development, or for
>> migration, not so much on a production system where performance is
>> important.
>>
>>
> You're perfectly right. I'm used to have several clusters on the same
> host (application testing in my case).
> In this benchmark context, though, I just was being wary that they may
> interfere, For instance, I suppose that an autovacuum wakeup in one
> should lower performance results of the other.
>
> Sorry it that sounded more general than that.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Hi,

Thanks for the extensive discussion.

In my case,vacuum performance plays an important role. Hence, I shall run only one server at a time while profiling.

Thanks a ton,

Atri

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-12-24 15:01:02 Re: Insert Assertion Failed in strcoll_l.c:112
Previous Message Benoît Bidaine 2012-12-24 11:51:31 pg_ctl: could not start service "pgsql-8.2": error code 1063