Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level?

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level?
Date: 2000-02-20 15:52:43
Message-ID: 38B00DCB.2F2B15AC@tm.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > Can you give me a failure condition for the TODO list? I can't see the
> > bug here.
>
> Well, now that I got off my duff and tried your little test with my
> current sources, I get your result. Hannu??

Btw, how did you try them ?

Could it be that psql is now stripping comments even in non-interactive
mode (when using -c or redirected stdin)?

Could you test with some other frontend (python, perl, tcl, C) ?

------------
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-02-20 16:34:38 Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2000-02-20 15:49:56 Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level?