From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level? |
Date: | 2000-02-20 15:49:56 |
Message-ID: | 38B00D24.AB13D9A9@tm.ee |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > Can you give me a failure condition for the TODO list? I can't see the
> > bug here.
>
> Well, now that I got off my duff and tried your little test with my
> current sources, I get your result. Hannu??
My tests were with 6.5.3 which has even more yuckies in it :
[hannu(at)hu hannu]$ psql -c "select -- what ?
> count(*) from t1;"
ERROR: attribute 'what' not found
[hannu(at)hu hannu]$ psql -c "select -- what
> count(*) from t1;"
ERROR: parser: parse error at or near "count"
[hannu(at)hu hannu]$ psql -c "select count(*) -- what
> from t1;"
count
-----
3
(1 row)
But they all work from psql
hannu=> select -- what ?
hannu-> count(*) from t1;
count
-----
3
(1 row)
hannu=> select count(*) -- what ?
hannu-> from t1;
count
-----
3
(1 row)
Could you try them on current.
-------------
Hannu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2000-02-20 15:52:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-02-20 14:22:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance |