Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?
Date: 2000-02-19 02:08:42
Message-ID: 38ADFB2A.84FF7EA9@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I got the impression from the paragraph that followed that we don't
> and the first query I tried bounced from commandline
> So assumed it was handled in psql when in interactive mode.

Yuck. They *were* talking about InterBase, but you're right!

Didn't realize that scan.l had lost (or never did have) the right
stuff. Will be fixed before we're out of beta...

- Tom

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-02-19 02:24:38 Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-19 02:05:56 Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?