| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ? |
| Date: | 2000-02-19 02:05:56 |
| Message-ID: | 200002190205.VAA24822@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > I got the impression from the paragraph that followed that we don't
> > and the first query I tried bounced from commandline
> > So assumed it was handled in psql when in interactive mode.
>
> Yuck. They *were* talking about InterBase, but you're right!
>
> Didn't realize that scan.l had lost (or never did have) the right
> stuff. Will be fixed before we're out of beta...
Can you give me a failure condition for the TODO list? I can't see the
bug here.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-02-19 02:08:42 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-19 01:38:06 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ? |