From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ? |
Date: | 2000-02-18 23:36:38 |
Message-ID: | 38ADD786.97A98EF4@tm.ee |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> I've since seen the article in the latest issue of PCWeek. The article
> was not at all clear on the *specific* features which would disqualify
> Postgres from having SQL92 entry level compliance (for most commercial
> RDBMSes this is the only level they attain), and I was amused to note
> that although InterBase was lauded for SQL92 compliance, the author
> did encourage them to consider supporting the SQL92 comment delimiter
> ("--") in their next release :))
Why does PostgreSQL _not_ support the -- comment delimiter ?
Is there something complicated to supporting it in parser ?
IMNSHO it would require only a few lines in gram.y
Does supporting user-defined operators interfere ?
I assume we could comfortably disallow -- as a possible operator (one
can't input it from interactive psql anyway)
--------------
Hannu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-19 00:00:18 | Re: [HACKERS] queries on 2+ indices |
Previous Message | Mauricio da Silva Barrios | 2000-02-18 16:33:57 | Is it a bug? |