From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ? |
Date: | 2000-02-19 00:38:35 |
Message-ID: | 200002190038.TAA20900@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I believe it is Interbase that does not support the -- comment.
> Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> >
> > I've since seen the article in the latest issue of PCWeek. The article
> > was not at all clear on the *specific* features which would disqualify
> > Postgres from having SQL92 entry level compliance (for most commercial
> > RDBMSes this is the only level they attain), and I was amused to note
> > that although InterBase was lauded for SQL92 compliance, the author
> > did encourage them to consider supporting the SQL92 comment delimiter
> > ("--") in their next release :))
>
> Why does PostgreSQL _not_ support the -- comment delimiter ?
>
> Is there something complicated to supporting it in parser ?
>
> IMNSHO it would require only a few lines in gram.y
>
> Does supporting user-defined operators interfere ?
>
> I assume we could comfortably disallow -- as a possible operator (one
> can't input it from interactive psql anyway)
>
> --------------
> Hannu
>
> ************
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Roberto Cornacchia | 2000-02-19 01:23:38 | Generalized Top Queries on PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-19 00:21:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ? |