Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation

From: Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation
Date: 2000-02-13 23:17:00
Message-ID: 38A73B6C.74D38DB5@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> I have currently got it working (I think; not too well tested yet)
> using the proposal I offered before of "pay attention to the size
> of LIMIT, but ignore OFFSET", so that the same query plan will be
> derived from similar queries with different OFFSETs. Does anyone
> have a substantial gripe with that compromise?

Would offset be any use if you did make use of it?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2000-02-13 23:29:12 Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation
Previous Message Chris Bitmead 2000-02-13 23:11:36 Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation