From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | chris(at)bitmead(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation |
Date: | 2000-02-13 23:29:12 |
Message-ID: | 3.0.1.32.20000213152912.010daa30@mail.pacifier.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 10:11 AM 2/14/00 +1100, Chris Bitmead wrote:
>> Of the standard aggregates, "count()" is probably the only one that
>> could make use of it. And of course only rarely is count() used
>> in such a way.
>
>I think a lot of the agregates could make use of it. For example, tell
>me all the departments who have spent more than $1000,000 this year...
>
>select deptid, sum(amount) > 1000000 from purchases group by deptid;
This would be harder, because you could only guarantee that sum is
of all positive or negative numbers if the user provides a constraint.
>> As someone who has long made his living implementing optimizing
>> compilers, I don't think that optimizing expressions such as the
>> one Chris mentions is all that difficult a task.
>>
>> But there are far more important things to think about implementing
>> in Postgres.
>
>Yep.
Good, because I was about to repeat myself :)
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-13 23:43:31 | Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation |
Previous Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-02-13 23:17:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation |