| From: | Stephen Birch <sbirch(at)ironmountainsystems(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re:HEAP_MOVED_IN during vacuum - test case |
| Date: | 2000-01-10 07:24:41 |
| Message-ID: | 38798939.4D96DAE0@ironmountainsystems.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I still can't believe how fast you guys are, but would like to thank
you.
If I understood the vacuum logic, I would check your fixes, but it is
still black magic to me!! I did try the new code against the full
database and found no problems. As far as I can tell, you found it.
Thanks again.
Steve
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > The following patch seems to fix your case.
> > However I'm not sure it's a right solution.
>
> That looks like nearly the same logic that I arrived at, although
> what I committed included some additional code cleanups. As I said
> in my prior message, I don't fully trust it yet --- but I am glad
> you came to the same conclusion.
>
> regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Mount | 2000-01-10 09:04:53 | RE: [HACKERS] make JDBC postgresql.jar error |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-01-10 06:38:27 | Cache invalidation was changed a little |