Re: [HACKERS] Re:HEAP_MOVED_IN during vacuum - test case

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "Stephen Birch" <sbirch(at)ironmountainsystems(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "The Hermit Hacker" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re:HEAP_MOVED_IN during vacuum - test case
Date: 2000-01-10 04:48:31
Message-ID: 2019.947479711@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> The following patch seems to fix your case.
> However I'm not sure it's a right solution.

That looks like nearly the same logic that I arrived at, although
what I committed included some additional code cleanups. As I said
in my prior message, I don't fully trust it yet --- but I am glad
you came to the same conclusion.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-01-10 04:56:21 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgres Features for 7.X
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-10 04:35:17 Number of index fields configurable