From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Hmm, almost-a-Y2K-bug in abstime regression test |
Date: | 2000-01-03 08:38:17 |
Message-ID: | 38705FF9.A3C25187@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> It's not exactly a Y2K bug, because it started to fail at Dec 30 1999
> 23:00:00, your local time. Nonetheless, the abstime regression test
> is now showing a "failure". It's not a code bug --- it's that the test
> includes a query whose results depend on whether current time is before
> or after 12-30-1999. Boo hiss.
Ah, those short-sighted coders back in 1986 didn't even think about
Y2K coming along.
> Probably the best answer is to leave the test script alone and change
> the expected output. Thomas, do you have a different opinion?
Hmm. That's probably the right thing to do, but it just propagates the
poor form of expecting the system clock on a test machine to always be
set to something after the time the regression test was written. I
might reformulate the queries to reduce the dependency on current
time, assuming that we don't lose some of the testing space while
doing it...
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ansley, Michael | 2000-01-03 12:14:52 | RE: [HACKERS] Docs |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-01-03 08:20:27 | Re: [HACKERS] Docs |