RE: [HACKERS] Docs

Thanks, everybody, I think I have enough info now to start documenting the
changes that I've made so far.

MikeA

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thomas Lockhart [mailto:lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu]
>> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2000 10:20 AM
>> To: Ed Loehr
>> Cc: Ansley, Michael; 'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'
>> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Docs
>>
>>
>> > > > Another question... how do people normally edit the
>> docs? Is there an sgml
>> > > > editor that I can use, or should I do it in some other
>> format, and have it
>> > > > converted, or what?
>> > > As Vince mentioned, xemacs is the first choice.
>> > Now, don't go startin' no feud here... if you need a space
>> shuttle, xemacs is
>> > it. But if you need the One True Editor, well, of
>> course...it's vi/vim. :)
>>
>> Michael wasn't asking for a space shuttle, but he *was*
>> asking for "an
>> sgml editor", which implied to me an editor with some knowledge of
>> sgml notation. afaik The AntiEditor is the only freeware tool to do
>> this...
>>
>> btw, xemacs is preferred over emacs since the xemacs "version 6"
>> implementation of DTD parsing can handle the DocBook DTD, whereas the
>> newer emacs "version 7" implementation barfs with some internal array
>> error when reading our docs after parsing the DTD. These are recent
>> results from my Mandrake/RedHat-6.1 Linux distro.
>>
>> - Thomas
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Lockhart
>> lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
>> South Pasadena, California
>>
>> ************
>>