| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: cvs head initdb hangs on unixware |
| Date: | 2008-12-10 17:36:38 |
| Message-ID: | 3867.1228930598@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> Tom Lane napsal(a):
>> No, the standard way to deal with such issues is to set up two buildfarm
>> members.
> I think current infrastructures is not good for it. For example I would like to
> compile postgres on one machine with three different compiler and in 32 or 64
> mode. Should I have 6 animals?
Yes.
> I think better idea is to have one animal and
> several test sets.
That simply complicates everything --- the reporting infrastructure,
identifying which case failed, etc --- without actually improving
anything.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-12-10 17:37:39 | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-12-10 17:29:36 | Re: cvs head initdb hangs on unixware |