| From: | Christof Petig <christof(dot)petig(at)wtal(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining |
| Date: | 1999-12-15 08:27:39 |
| Message-ID: | 385750FB.F989A609@wtal.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Remember, chaining tuples had all sorts of performance, vacuum, code
> handling, and UPDATE problems. They buy us very little, and almost
> nothing if we have LONG tables.
>
I had already contacted Jan in private Email. Since we share country,
native language and time zone, this is even the most comfortable way.
I agree with the concerns you mailed and will (most likely) start
helping Jan to implement LONG. As I had seen your LONG discussion
_after_ my original post, this had been a strange coincidence. But I had
been following it with interest.
Christof
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 1999-12-15 10:29:09 | Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1 |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 1999-12-15 08:15:38 | postmaster dies (6.5.3) |