Re: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>, christof(dot)petig(at)wtal(dot)de, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining
Date: 1999-12-15 02:52:14
Message-ID: 199912150252.VAA15062@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Remember, chaining tuples had all sorts of performance, vacuum, code
handling, and UPDATE problems. They buy us very little, and almost
nothing if we have LONG tables.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-12-15 05:52:15 Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? select, count(*), group by and empty tables
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 1999-12-15 02:43:51 RE: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining