Re: "make check" changes have caused buildfarm deterioration.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "make check" changes have caused buildfarm deterioration.
Date: 2015-07-20 21:17:34
Message-ID: 3851.1437427054@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)pgexperts(dot)com> writes:
> Somewhere along the way some changes to the way we do "make check" have
> caused a significant deterioration in the buildfarm's logging. Compare
> these two from animal crake, which happens to be my test instance:
> <http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2015-07-20%2013%3A09%3A02&stg=check>
> and
> <http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2015-07-20%2017%3A23%3A08&stg=check>

Yeah, I've been bitching about the poor logging for awhile, but I had
not realized that it's still working as-expected in the back branches.

Comparing different branches, it looks like "somewhere along the way"
means "between 9.4 and 9.5". I suspect that commit dcae5faccab64776, or
perhaps the followon dbf2ec1a1c053379, is to blame.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-07-20 22:10:48 Re: Unnecessary #include in objectaddress.h?
Previous Message Adam Brightwell 2015-07-20 21:10:48 Unnecessary #include in objectaddress.h?