Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL

From: Ed Loehr <ELOEHR(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
To: Kyle Bateman <kyle(at)actarg(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL
Date: 1999-12-07 18:08:58
Message-ID: 384D4D3A.2C2C3DF5@austin.rr.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kyle Bateman wrote:

> Now again, these are just suggestions, but I think the following are good ideas:
>
> 3. Do not disclose these bids to the public

> 4. Do not disclose the received pledges to date to the public

I'm curious about your rationale for 3 and 4. Why not disclose bid amounts (not bidders) and
received pledge amounts (not pledgers) to the public prior to the work being completed? What
do you think would happen?

Ed Loehr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 1999-12-07 18:09:50 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce)
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-12-07 17:52:54 Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce)