Re: MERGE lacks ruleutils.c decompiling support!?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MERGE lacks ruleutils.c decompiling support!?
Date: 2023-05-06 02:49:15
Message-ID: 3844910.1683341355@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> +WHEN NOT MATCHED
> + AND s.a > 100
> + THEN INSERT (id, data) OVERRIDING SYSTEM VALUE
> + VALUES (s.a, DEFAULT)

> About OVERRIDING, I can see that this is still missing coverage for
> OVERRIDING USER VALUE.

Yeah, I couldn't see that covering that too was worth any cycles.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-05-06 02:51:19 Re: Add LZ4 compression in pg_dump
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-05-06 02:46:06 Re: MERGE lacks ruleutils.c decompiling support!?