From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |
Date: | 2011-05-09 20:21:30 |
Message-ID: | 3818.1304972490@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun may 09 14:31:33 -0400 2011:
>> I'm happy enough with that set of guidelines: namely, that we'd use
>> src/extension only for things that don't require additional
>> dependencies, and not for things that build standalone executables.
>> If we're going to move things around, I think we should take the
>> trouble to categorize them along the way, and your idea of inserting
>> one more subdirectory under src/extension for grouping seems fine to
>> me.
> For executables we already have src/bin. Do we really need a separate
> place for, say, pg_standby or pg_upgrade?
Putting them in there implies we think they are of core-code quality.
I'm definitely *not* ready to grant that status to pg_upgrade, for
instance.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-05-09 20:43:10 | Re: Inconsistent treatment of serials in pg_dump |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-05-09 20:16:05 | Re: Inconsistent treatment of serials in pg_dump |